2
$\begingroup$

Let $K$ be a field and let $n\geq 2$. If $n=2$, then the set of $K$-isomorphism classes of $PGL_n$-torsors is in bijection with the $n$-torsion of the Brauer group of $K$.

Is this only for $n=2$?

Is there any relation between $H^1(G_K,PGL_n)$ and the Brauer group for $n>2$?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ This is discussed, for instance, in Serre's book "Galois Cohomology". Assuming that the characteristic is prime to $n$, there is a map $\Delta:H^1(G_K,\text{PGL}_n) \to H^2(G_K,\mu_n)$. The theory of central simple algebras shows that this map is injective. It is frequently not surjective. However, it is surjective for many classes of fields of cohomological dimension $2$. Such results are frequently called "Period-Index Theorems", e.g., the Period-Index Theorem of Johan de Jong. $\endgroup$ Oct 20, 2016 at 14:08

1 Answer 1

10
$\begingroup$

Your first statement is not quite true. A $\mathrm{PGL}_2$-torsor does indeed give an element of order $2$ in the Brauer group, but there can be elements of order $2$ in the Brauer group of a general field $K$ that are not represented by quaternion algebras, so do not come from $\mathrm{PGL}_2$-torsors. What is true is that the image generates the $2$-torsion in the Brauer group: this follows from the Merkurjev-Suslin theorem. Part of the reason this is confusing is that $\mathrm{H}^1(K,\mathrm{PGL}_n)$ is not a group, since $\mathrm{PGL}_n$ is not commutative. Look up the period-index problem for more details.

That said, there is indeed a natural map $\mathrm{H}^1(K,\mathrm{PGL}_n) \to \mathrm{Br}(K)$ for arbitrary $n$: it comes from the exact sequence in (non-Abelian) cohomology coming from the short exact sequence

$0 \to \mathbb{G}_m \to \mathrm{GL}_n \to \mathrm{PGL}_n \to 0$

of algebraic groups over $K$, together with the identification $\mathrm{Br}(K) = \mathrm{H}^2(K,\mathbb{G}_m)$. To see that the image lands in the $n$-torsion, compare this with the corresponding sequence for $\mathrm{SL}_n$ and use the Kummer sequence.

There are lots of references for this kind of stuff; an excellent one is Central simple algebras and Galois cohomology by Gille and Szamuely.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.