15
$\begingroup$

Let $L$ stand for the field obtained by adjoining to ${\Bbb Q}$ all roots of all polynomials of the form $x^n+ax+b$, $a,b\in {\Bbb Q}$.

What polynomials $p$ don't split over $L$? In particular, how low can one make the degree of such a $p$?

Classically, $S_n$ occurs as a Galois group for certain $x^n+ax+b$, $n\geq 5$. That means that obstructions for $p$ splitting over such $L$ must reflect information beyond the Galois group of $p$. So absent a full answer to my question, what candidates does one have for such an obstruction? For example, does the form of the polynomial single out particular representations of $S_n$?

Again, absent a full answer, does the literature contain theorems about polynomials not splitting over similar large extension of ${\Bbb Q}$?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ Utterly trivial remarks (which I make only because they could have been included in the question): any quadratic poly is already of the form $x^2+ax+b$, and "completing the cube" says that any cubic is of the form $x^3+ax+b$ after a linear change of variables, so the smallest degree of such a $p$, if one exists, is at least 4. $\endgroup$
    – Kevin Buzzard
    Dec 9, 2010 at 10:47
  • $\begingroup$ Welcome, David! $\endgroup$
    – Jon Bannon
    Dec 9, 2010 at 13:07
  • $\begingroup$ A stupid remark on your question: you are asking whether all extensions are contained in an extension of Q generated by a root of $x^n+ax+b$. Say you are more ambitious and ask if equality holds, i.e. if it has a generator of this shape. If so, in particular any extension of Q_p has a generator of this kind and any finite extension as well. If n=6 and p=7, all such polynomials are reducible, so this ambitious generality is not true. But you can ask the original question in finite fields to have a hint of what the answer is... $\endgroup$
    – A. Pacetti
    Dec 9, 2010 at 14:52
  • $\begingroup$ I realized in the cold light of morning (but haven't had the time till now to write), that I simply hadn't asked the question I'd intended. I'd simply edit my original question, but now it seems my accidental question has some interest in itself. What I had meant to say was: Let $L$ stand for the smallest extension of ${\Bbb Q}$ closed under the operation of adjoining all roots of polynomials of the form $x^n+ax+b, a,b∈L$. Should I start a new question? $\endgroup$
    – David Feldman
    Dec 9, 2010 at 19:37
  • $\begingroup$ Sure, start a new question, and link to it from here. $\endgroup$
    – Scott Morrison
    Dec 9, 2010 at 22:51

0

Reset to default

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.