Let $F: Rep_k(G) \to k\mathsf{-mod}$ be the fibre functor. $G$ can be reconstructed from this functor and the monoidal structure as the group of automorphisms, because $t: G\to Aut(F,\otimes,k), g\mapsto (t_g^V)_{V\in Rep_k(G)}$ is an isomorphism, where $t_g^V$ is just the $k$-linear map $F(V)\to F(V), v\mapsto gv$. Because the morphisms in $Rep_k(G)$ are $k[G]$-linear maps, $t_g$ really is a natural transformation. It clearly satisfies $t_g^{-1}=t_{g^{-1}}$ so that it is a natural automorphism of $F$. By definition of the monodial structure it also satisfies $t_g^{V\otimes W} = t_g^V\otimes t_g^W$ and $t_g^{k} = id$.
$t$ is injective, because $g = t_g^{k[G]}(1)$. $t$ is surjective, because if $\tau=(\tau^V)$ is any natural automorphism of $F$ and $u:=\tau^{k[G]}(1)$, then $u$ is a unit of $k[G]$ because $\tau$ is invertible and by naturality of $\tau$ applied to the $k[G]$-linear map $k[G]\to V, 1\mapsto v$, one sees that $\tau^V = v\mapsto uv$. $u$ is not just any invertible element, it is an element of $G$, because $\tau^{V\otimes W} = \tau^V\otimes\tau^W$ and $\tau^k=id$: Write $u=\sum_g a_g g$ with coefficients $a_g\in k$ and consider how $\tau$ acts on $k[G]\otimes k[G]$. On the one hand, it is multiplication by $u$, so $\tau(x\otimes y) = u(x\otimes y) = \sum_g a_g g(x\otimes y) = \sum_g a_g (gx)\otimes(gy)$. On the other hand, it is $\tau^{k[G]}\otimes\tau^{k[G]}$, so that $\tau(x\otimes y) = (ux)\otimes(uy) = \sum_{g,h} a_g a_h (gx)\otimes(hy)$. Letting $x=y=1$ and comparing coefficients, we find $a_g a_h = 0$ for all $g\neq h$. This means that at most one of the coefficients is non-zero. The action on the trivial module $k$ is trivial so that $1=\tau(1) = u1 = \sum_g a_g$ from which we conclude that there is exactly one non-zero coefficient that it is equal to one, i.e. $u$ is a group element.
Therefore if you have the full category of all representations with its fibre functor and the monoidal structure, it is trivially easy to reconstruct $G$. The point of the Tannakian theory is that for certain groups knowledge of the finite-dimensional part of $Rep_k(G)$ is sufficient to reconstruct $G$.