6
$\begingroup$

Let $G$ be a finite abelian group, and its higher classifying space is $B^nG=K(G,n)$. For $n=1$ it is well known that $H^2(B G, \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}) \cong H^2(G,\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})$ is isomorphic to the group of alternating bicharacters over $G$, where the isomorphism sends a class $[\nu]\in H^2(G,\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})$ to its commutator $$ \chi_\nu(g,h)=\nu(g,h)-\nu(h,g) \ . $$ An heuristic and intuitive way to understand this is that if $X_2$ is a 2-manifold and $A\in H^1(X,G)$, you can construct the pull-back $A^*[\nu]\in H^2(X,\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})$, which should be represented by a 2-cocycle constructed out of $A$. The natural candidate is the cup product $A\cup _{\chi} A$ associated with a bilinear map $\chi :G\times G\rightarrow \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}$, and since $A$ has degree-1 this product must be antisymmetric. This is heuristic and indeed antisymmetric is not enough, you need alternating, but it is just a way to guess a possible result.

For $n=2$ there is something similar: $$ H^4(B^2G,\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})\cong \Gamma(G)^\vee $$ where $\Gamma(G)$ is the universal quadratic group of $G$, and its Pontryagin dual $\Gamma(G)^\vee$ can be understood as the group of $\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}$-valued quadratic function over $G$. Also here there is an heuristic argument. Given a 4-manifold $X_4$, $[\nu]\in H^4(B^2G,\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})$ and $A\in H^2(X_4,G)$ you construct $A^*[\nu]\in H^4(X_4,\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})$ which is represented by a 4-cocycle constructed out of $A$, and a natural candidate is $A\cup _{\chi} A$, where now the cup product is constructed from a symmetric bilinear map, since $A$ has degree-2. Again this is not complete since we actually need more than a symmetric map, we need a quadratic refinement of it.

  1. Is there an analogous result for $n=3$?. By the same heuristic arguments, since $\cup$ is antisymmetric on $H^3(X_6,G)$, the natural guess is that $H^6(B^3G,\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})$ is isomorphic to a group somehow related with that of antisymmetric bicharacters on $G$.

  2. Is there a generalization to any $n$? The heuristic arguments are only based on the parity of the degree, hence they seem to suggest that in general $$ H^{2n}(B^nG,\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}) $$ should be isomorphic to a group associated with $G$, which is a kind of refinement of the group of symmetric (antisymmetric respectively) bilinear forms over $G$ for $n$ even (odd respectively). Is this true in some form? In case, what is the kind of refinement involved?

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ Your heuristic is true for $H^{n+2}$. $\endgroup$ Jul 11 at 19:42
  • $\begingroup$ No, the cup product doubles the degree, hence it must be 2n. $\endgroup$ Jul 11 at 20:10
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, my mistake, that’s the Hom from $G/2G$. Your case is nevertheless more complicated than what you think, even for small $n$, as you can check in the Eilenberg-MacLane papers, e.g. it contains the Hom from $G/3G$ for $n=4$. $\endgroup$ Jul 11 at 21:05
  • $\begingroup$ They show that $H^{2n}$ with coeficiente is $S^1$ is a quadratic functor. No general formula though. $\endgroup$ Jul 11 at 21:18
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ If I'm not mistaken, Goodwillie calculus provides an exact sequence $0\to H^{n}(HG)\to H^{2n}(B^nG)\to\operatorname{Sym}(G\times G;\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}) \to H^{n+1}(HG)$ (if $n$ is even, antisymmetric maps instead if it is odd). Here $HG$ denotes the Eilenberg-MacLane spectrum of $G$. $\endgroup$ Jul 12 at 6:32

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

Let me turn my comment into an answer, since I think it qualifies as an answer to the literal question you ask at the end of 2. (although you might be disappointed about the non-explicitness)

Your heuristic guess is absolutely correct, for a fixed abelian group $A$, $H^{n+k}(B^n G;A)$ as a functor in $G$ behaves in a polynomial way. For $k<n$, it is additive in $G$, and in fact independent of $n$, agreeing with $H^k(HG;A)$ where $HG$ is the Eilenberg-MacLane spectrum of $G$, a kind of limiting case of the $B^n G$. For $k=n$, quadratic effects begin to contribute, for $k=2n$, cubic, and so on. This is explicit in something like $H^*(B^2G;\mathbb{Z})$, which, for finitely generated free abelian groups $G$ looks like a polynomial algebra.

Goodwillie calculus provides an explicit formalism for dealing with such polynomial functors. Concretely, it assigns to a functor $F$ a tower of approximations $P_d F$ where you should think of $P_d F$ as "best polynomial-of-degree-$d$ approximation to $F$". In the case of the cohomology of Eilenberg-MacLane spaces, we are interested in the functor $$ \mathrm{Sp}\to \mathrm{Sp}, X\mapsto \Sigma^\infty\Omega^{\infty - n}X, $$ since this takes $HG\mapsto \Sigma^\infty B^nG$, a spectrum whose cohomology is the cohomology of $B^n G$. Formally, one computes that $P_1 F(X) = \Sigma^n X$, and that the fiber of $P_2F(X)\to P_1F(X)$ is $(\Sigma^n X)^{\otimes 2}_{h\Sigma_2}$. The higher fibers will have even higher connectivity, and the tower will converge to $F$ for connective $X$ (both nontrivial statements!), so we find an exact sequence $$ 0 \to H^{2n}(\Sigma^n HG;A) \to H^{2n}(B^nG;A) \to H^{2n}((\Sigma^n HG)^{\otimes 2}_{h\Sigma_2};A) \to H^{2n+1}(\Sigma^n HG; A) $$ and since $(\Sigma^n HG)^{\otimes 2}_{h\Sigma_2}$ is $2n$-connective with $\pi_{2n} \cong (G\otimes G)_{\Sigma_2}$ with $\Sigma_2$-action given by the flip if $n$ even, the signed flip if $n$ odd, this simplifies to $$ 0 \to H^n(HG;A) \to H^{2n}(B^n G;A) \to \mathrm{Sym}'(G\times G; A) \to H^{n+1}(HG;A) $$ where $\mathrm{Sym}'(G\times G; A)$ denotes symmetric or antisymmetric bilinear forms depending on the parity of $n$. This identifies $H^{2n}(B^n G;A)$ with an extension of a subgroup of $\mathrm{Sym}'$ (those forms for which a certain invariant in $H^{n+1}(HG;A)$ vanishes), by the group $H^n(HG;A)$. Cohomology of Eilenberg-MacLane spaces has been computed explicitly (for general $G$ and $A$, I believe, but I don't know references), but the answer is necessarily complicated since the "linear part" $H^*(HG;A)$ is already quite complicated.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ This is certainly in the right direction. I don't understand the details but if I'm not wrong you are saying that $H^{2n}(B^nG,\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})$ is the extension of a subgroup of (anti)symmetric forms by a group which in principle can be computed. Just to make sure if I understand correctly how this reproduces the results I already knew, for $n=1$ this subgroup should be that of alternating forms while $H^1(HG,\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})$ should be trivial right? For $n=2$ the subgroup is not proper while $H^2(HG,\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}_2$ giving characteristic elements right? $\endgroup$ Jul 15 at 10:35
  • $\begingroup$ For $n=2$, $H^2(HG,\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})$ should be $\operatorname{Hom}(G, \mathbb{Z}/2)$ (it is always additive and contravariant in $G$, so it can't be constant) $\endgroup$ Jul 15 at 10:44
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry you are right, I was confused. Indeed the universal quadratic group is precisely an extension of $Sym (G\times G,\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})$ by $\text{Hom}(G,\mathbb{Z}(2)$, the latter giving the characteristic elements. For instance for $G=\mathbb{Z}_n$ the universal quadratic group if $\mathbb{Z}_{2n}$ if $n$ is even and $\mathbb{Z}_n$ if $n$ is odd. $\endgroup$ Jul 15 at 11:17
  • $\begingroup$ Do you have some pedagogical refererence for the results you are quoting? Also do you knoe what's happen specializing to $n=3$? $\endgroup$ Jul 15 at 11:19
  • $\begingroup$ For $n=3$, one can compute $H^3(HG;\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})=\operatorname{Hom}(G[2],\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})$ and $H^4 =\operatorname{Hom}(G, \mathbb{Z}/6)$, where $G[2]$ is the $2$-torsion subgroup of $G$. Not sure what the extension is. $\endgroup$ Jul 15 at 20:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.