0
$\begingroup$

Let $S$ be a K3 surface and $f:S\rightarrow \mathbb{P}^1$ a $T^2$-fibration (not necessarily holomorphic, I have a special Langrangian fibration in mind). Assume there is a $k$-section, then a fiber and the $k$-section generate a sublattice $L\subset H^{2}(S,\mathbb{Z})$, which is isomorphic to $U(k)$ (hyperbolic lattice multiplied by $k \in \mathbb{N}$).

Assume also that there is an holomorphic involution $\sigma$ of $S$ such that induced action $\sigma^{*}$ acts as $-id$ on $L$ (especially preserves $L\subset H^{2}(S,\mathbb{Z})$). Is it true that $\sigma$ preserves the fibration? If so, could one tell how $\sigma$ acts on each smooth fiber of $f$? If not so, what additional condition is required?

Edit The original question does not mach much sense. The fibration is NOT holomorphic. the following is the motivation of my question. I have a K3 surface $S$ with an anti-symplectic involution $\sigma$. Assume that, by using another complex structure, we can construct an elliptic fibration $f:S\rightarrow \mathbb{P}^{1}$ (possibly with no section). I hope this map to be a special Lagrangian $T^2$-fibration with respect to the original complex structure. I now want to understnad how $\sigma$ and the map $f$ are related.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Are you saying that $\sigma$ takes an effective class to a negative effective class? If not, what does it mean that $\sigma^*$ acts as $-id$? $\endgroup$
    – Sándor Kovács
    Sep 5, 2012 at 23:39
  • $\begingroup$ Indeed, $-id$ on an elliptic surface, if it exists and preserves $L$, acts as $id$ on $L$, since it preserves degree and preserves the class of a fiber. If $\sigma$ acts as $id$, then it preserves the fibration, since it preserves the class of the fiber, and the fibration is just the map to $\mathbb P^1$ coming from the global sections of the line bundle whose divisor class is the class of the fiber. $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Sep 6, 2012 at 0:11
  • $\begingroup$ My first question does not make much sense. I made a major change in my question, also adding some motivation of my question. I am sorry for the confusion. $\endgroup$
    – Carmen
    Sep 6, 2012 at 0:31

0

Reset to default

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.