Timeline for Conditions for metrisability
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13 at 15:43 | comment | added | Will Brian | Apparently Peter wrote down some of his thoughts on this problem: people.math.sc.edu/nyikos/Reed.pdf | |
| Sep 13 at 15:41 | history | edited | Will Brian | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 29 characters in body
|
| Sep 13 at 15:38 | comment | added | Will Brian | Hi Mike, welcome to MO. If you'd like to clarify your question further, or include some more of what you know about it, then the normal way to do that is to edit the question and include that information as part of the question. I hope you don't mind -- I'm going to edit your question and move the data from the answer you posted so as to make it part of the question. | |
| Sep 13 at 15:36 | comment | added | Will Brian | This is a very interesting problem, and it is still open, as far as I know. Peter Nyikos was working on it a few years ago and I heard him lecture about it a few times. I don't think he made much progress beyond what's already mentioned in Mike's answer, though. | |
| Sep 13 at 15:34 | history | edited | Will Brian | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 29 characters in body
|
| Sep 13 at 13:21 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 18 at 3:05 | |||||
| Sep 13 at 12:10 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek | Union of open metrizable subspaces implies first-countable, hence the latter condition is redundant. | |
| Sep 13 at 11:49 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | Have you asked the question you intended? You say it is normal at the beginning. | |
| S Sep 13 at 11:26 | review | First questions | |||
| Sep 13 at 13:01 | |||||
| S Sep 13 at 11:26 | history | asked | Mike Reed | CC BY-SA 4.0 |