Timeline for Computation of the linking invariant on Lens spaces
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15 at 10:40 | vote | accept | Andrea Antinucci | ||
| May 23 at 18:43 | history | edited | Andrea Antinucci | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added information and a furhter preliminary question
|
| May 14 at 22:42 | history | became hot network question | |||
| May 14 at 20:40 | answer | added | Danny Ruberman | timeline score: 5 | |
| May 14 at 15:22 | comment | added | Andrea Antinucci | That's a good point. Indeed I think the guesses should be refined somehow, but I don't know how. In some way the extension appears in the definition of the Bockstein map, but it is certainly true that the Poincarè dual cannot depend on it. If the extension is trivial (split sequence) so is the Bockstein and the guess is certainly wrong. I am assuming a non-trivial extension, and maybe there is some factor between the Poincarè dual and $\beta(A)$.... | |
| May 14 at 15:10 | comment | added | John Wiltshire-Gordon | Why is the extension $\Gamma$ not appearing in your guesses? Do you have a particular one in mind? | |
| S May 14 at 14:41 | review | First questions | |||
| May 14 at 16:22 | |||||
| S May 14 at 14:41 | history | asked | Andrea Antinucci | CC BY-SA 4.0 |