Questions tagged [grothendieck-topology]
The grothendieck-topology tag has no usage guidance.
123
questions
2
votes
1
answer
72
views
Are the injections of a coproduct a cover in the canonical pretopology?
Assume we're in a category $C$ with all pullbacks and finite coproducts.
Recall that the canonical coverage of $C$ is the finest Grothendieck (pre) topology for which all representables are sheaves. A ...
- 237
6
votes
0
answers
204
views
Generalizing uniform structures as Grothendieck topologies
Recently, I was reading a classical book "Sheaves in Geometry and Logic" by S. MacLane and I. Moerdijk, and then it stroke me that, that the definition of Grothendieck Topology bears some ...
- 447
6
votes
1
answer
241
views
Relationship between canonical topology on a topos and its site of definition
The canonical (Grothendieck) topology for a category $C$ is the largest (finest) topology such that every representable presheaf over $C$ is a sheaf.
According to First Order Categorical Logic Lemma 1....
- 237
2
votes
1
answer
124
views
Is the slice of a subcanonical site also subcanonical?
A subcanonical site is one for which every representable functor is a sheaf.
For a subcanonical site $C$, the fundamental theorem of topos theory says that there is an equivalence $Sh(C/c)\cong Sh(C)/...
- 237
3
votes
0
answers
184
views
How to read the definition of Grothendieck Pretopology in SGA4?
In SGA4, the first axiom of a Grothendieck pretopology is given as:
PT0: Pour tout objet $X$ de $C$, les morphismes des familles de morphismes de $Cov(𝑋)$
sont quarrables. (Rappelons qu’un morphisme ...
- 237
6
votes
1
answer
232
views
Subobject classifier for sheaves on large sites with WISC
Let $\mathsf{C}$ be a possibly large category with a Grothendieck topology satisfying the Weakly Initial Set of Covers condition: there is for each $X$ a set (not a proper class) of covering families ...
- 1,956
8
votes
1
answer
307
views
The Grothendieck topology of closed immersions on schemes
Let $S$ be a scheme. Let's define a Grothendick topology on $\mathrm{Sch}/S$ where a covering family $\{f_i:Z_i\rightarrow X\}_{i\in I}$ on an $S$-scheme $X$ is a collection of closed immersions of $S$...
- 329
1
vote
0
answers
83
views
Why is the induced singleton pretopology closed under pullbacks?
Let $(C,\mathcal{T})$ be an arbitrary site with a pretopology $\mathcal{T}$. The category $C$ has coproducts.
As a pretopology I mean the definition 2.24 of Grothendieck topology
in Angelo Vistoli’s ...
- 119
2
votes
1
answer
161
views
Trivial Grothendieck topology and identity morphisms
So on nLab the definition of a trivial (Grothendieck) topology is the following: "The Grothendieck topology on any category for which only the identity morphisms are covering is the trivial ...
- 173
6
votes
1
answer
289
views
Decategorifying Grothendieck topoi and categorifying topological spaces
(This is in a sense a follow-up to this question.)
I was under the impression these days that Grothendieck topoi were also¹ analogous to topological spaces in that the former were left exact ...
- 9,727
6
votes
1
answer
435
views
Subsheaves of Spec K, K a field
$\DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec}\newcommand\Ring{\mathrm{Ring}}\newcommand\op{^\text{op}}\DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom}\DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh}$In the category of schemes the objects of the form $\...
- 765
4
votes
0
answers
165
views
Geometric intuition for pf in fppf-topology
I am trying to learn a bit about algebraic spaces and the various topologies on categories of schemes in general. And, as it seems to always be the case, I am struggling with understanding how exactly ...
- 961
0
votes
1
answer
165
views
Does the (Vistoli-)sheafification induce isomorphism?
Given a presheaf, in Angelo Vistoli's 2007 Notes on Grothendieck topologies,
fibered categories
and descent theory
there is a construction of the sheafification (Proof for theorem 2.64).
Note: In ...
- 119
3
votes
0
answers
148
views
Is the Grothendieck topology equivalent to its Singleton Grothendieck topology?
I'm using the definition of a Grothendieck topology in Angelo Vistoli’s 2007 Notes on Grothendieck topologies,
fibered categories
and descent theory and I found on nLab about superextensive site, that ...
- 119
3
votes
0
answers
131
views
Johnstone's Elephant - Lemma C2.1.7 confusion
I don't understand the proof of (ii) in the Johnstone's Elephant:
Lemma 2.1.6 is:
Now consider $\bigcup_{f \in R} f \circ f^*(S)$. This is my notation for the sieve Johnstone references in the proof ...
3
votes
1
answer
397
views
Proof without sieves: Equivalent grothendieck topologies have the same sheaves
I'm currently learning about sheaf theory with Angelo Vistoli’s 2007 Notes on Grothendieck topologies,
fibered categories and descent theory. And in page 35, there is the following definition of a ...
- 119
3
votes
1
answer
210
views
Compatibility of pullbacks with an equivalence relation
This question was originally posted last week in Math Stack Exchange (see here).
I'm currently working on the proof of the existence of the sheafification in Angelo Vistoli’s 2007 Notes on ...
- 119
3
votes
0
answers
187
views
The etymologies behind certain topologies on the category of schemes
Certain topologies on the category of schemes (or perhaps certain appropriate subcategories thereof) are named rather aptly, e.g. Zariski, étale, fppf, fpqc, syntomic, smooth, v(aluation), etc., but ...
- 1,432
5
votes
0
answers
169
views
Is there something similar to Lawvere-Tierney topologies for Abelian categories?
Lawvere-Tierney topologies generalize the notion of local operators on a Topos from Sheaf toposes over a Grothendieck site to arbitrary Toposes.
However, while the special case of Sheaves of sets or ...
- 1,803
5
votes
1
answer
243
views
Group scheme with an isotrivial maximal torus
Let $G$ be a reductive group scheme over a normal ring $A$. Then, we know that Zariski locally it admits a maximal torus.
Let us assume that it admits a maximal torus after a finite surjective (resp. ...
- 3,364
7
votes
1
answer
398
views
When is a basis of a topological space a Grothendieck pretopology?
Bases of a topological space in point set topology will in general form a coverage on its category of inclusion on open subsets and on its category of inclusion on basic opens, but it takes a bit more ...
- 1,803
4
votes
0
answers
223
views
Defining the h-topology via v-covers
I have two questions about v-covers and the h-topology (as defined by Voevodsky) which arose when reading Bhatt-Scholze's "Projectivity of the Witt vector affine Grassmannian" available here ...
- 303
3
votes
1
answer
214
views
Sheaves on sites given by a (regular) cd-structure
Let $C$ be a category equipped with a Grothendieck topology generated by a cd-structure (see https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/cd-structure or Voevodsky's paper Homotopy theory of simplicial presheaves in ...
- 33
3
votes
0
answers
512
views
fppf/ etale Cohomology calculate with Cech cohomology
Let $R$ be a commutative ring with one and $S$ commutative faithfully flat $R$-algebra (that is there is a faithfully flat ring map
let $\phi: R \to S$). Then the so called Amitsur complex
$R \to S^{\...
- 5,716
4
votes
0
answers
295
views
Building intuition for the étale topology
My Honours supervisors have charged me with building intuition for étale morphisms and the étale topology. Their suggestions were to "compute the étale topology in a few simple cases", such ...
- 721
3
votes
0
answers
200
views
Is the category of covering spaces always a topos?
It is well knows that for a nice (locally path connected, semi-locally simply connected) topological spaces, the category of covering spaces over $X$ is equivalent to the functor category $\left[\Pi_1\...
- 430
13
votes
3
answers
1k
views
Resources for topos theory
I am trying to learn topos theory and I am finding a strong scarcity of resources. Is there any canonical textbook to refer someone to when learning this topic?
So far, I have only been able to find ...
6
votes
1
answer
317
views
Is there a notion of Čech groupoid of a cover of an object in a Grothendieck site?
Given a topological space $X$, and a cover $\mathcal{U} :=\cup_{\alpha \in I}U_{\alpha}$ of $X$, one can define a groupoid called Čech groupoid $C(\mathcal{U})$ of the cover $\mathcal{U}$ by $\...
- 1,185
5
votes
0
answers
169
views
Étale stack on $\text{Spec}(k)$
Let $\mathcal{F}:\text{Ét}(\text{Spec}(k))^{\mathrm{op}}\rightarrow \text{Set}$ be an étale presheaf. The étale sheaf condition for the cover $\text{Spec}(l)\rightarrow \text{Spec}(k)$ is
$$\mathcal{F}...
- 4,146
2
votes
0
answers
202
views
Localization of Chow groups and flat base change
For any flat morphism $f:X\rightarrow Y$, we have a flat pullback of Chow groups
$$Ch^i(Y)\rightarrow Ch^i(X).$$
A particular example of this is of course an open immersion $U\rightarrow X$. In that ...
- 4,146
2
votes
2
answers
461
views
What is the geometric description of the set of isomorphism class of $G$-torsors over a site $C$?
Let $X$ be a topological space and $G$ be a topological group. Let $\tilde{G}$ be the sheaf of groups defined by the sheaf of sections of the product $G$ bundle $ \pi_1:X\times G \rightarrow X $.
(1)...
- 1,185
3
votes
2
answers
367
views
Is any constant Zariski sheaf already a Nisnevich sheaf?
Lat $A$ be a set and $\underline{A}$ the associated constant Zariski sheaf on the category $Sm/S$ of schemes which are smooth over $S$ for a fixed base scheme $S$. Is $\underline{A}$ already a (...
- 1,836
5
votes
0
answers
228
views
$\ell$-adic Eilenberg-MacLane space and Brown representability
I posted the following question on MathStackexchange, where it was suggested that I should move my question to Mathoverflow, which do here (https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3550741/algebraic-...
- 4,146
2
votes
0
answers
184
views
Only discrete topology gives trivial topos?
Given a Grothendieck site $\mathsf{(C,\tau)}$, if the associated Grothendieck topos $\mathsf{Shv(C,\tau)}$ is trivial, i.e. $\mathsf{Shv(C,\tau)}$ consists of the terminal sheaf $*$ only, can we ...
- 1,836
9
votes
0
answers
621
views
When is fppf better than fpqc (and vice versa)?
Depending on a geometer's needs, they may use the Zariski/etale/syntomic/etc. topology on the spaces they consider. I know some settings where etale topology is better suited for the task than the ...
user145520
3
votes
1
answer
272
views
What to call a morphism of sites inducing an equivalence on categories of sheaves?
Is there a standard term for a morphism of sites $(C,J)\to(C',J')$ which induces an equivalence on sheaf categories $\operatorname{Sh}(C',J')\xrightarrow\sim\operatorname{Sh}(C,J)$? The nLab entry ...
- 18.1k
19
votes
1
answer
819
views
Has this "backwards" perspective on toposes been studied?
Topos theory can be seen as a categorification of topology via the following analogies.
\begin{array}{|c|c|}
\hline
\text{locales}&\text{Grothendieck toposes}\\\hline
\text{open sets}&\text{...
- 3,027
2
votes
0
answers
225
views
Significance of some expected results when defining Grothendieck topology
Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a category. Fixing an object $U$ of $\mathcal{C}$, there are some obvious functors we can associate to it, for example:
$h_U:\mathcal{C}^{op}\rightarrow \text{Set}$ given by $V\...
- 5,875
2
votes
1
answer
311
views
fppf-extension of algebraic groups is an algebraic group
The problem is the following:
Let $k$ be a field and let $N,G,Q: (\operatorname{Sch}/k)_{\operatorname{fppf}} \longrightarrow \operatorname{Grps}$
be fppf-sheaves from the big fppf-site of $\...
- 123
2
votes
1
answer
434
views
Stack associated to Groupoid object in category $\text{Sch}/S$
Consider the category of manifolds $\text{Man}$.
A groupoid object in the category of manifolds is called a Lie groupoid, denoted by $\mathcal{G}$. There is a way to associate a stack (over the ...
- 5,875
2
votes
1
answer
613
views
Why care about Grothendieck topology? [closed]
Noah Schweber said here the following:
Why would you want a notion of sheaf theory for objects more general
than topological spaces? Well, the original motivation (to my
understanding) was to ...
- 5,875
4
votes
1
answer
518
views
How to construct cup-product in a general site?
Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site on the category of schemes for some Grothendieck topology, $X$ a scheme, and let $F,G$ be two sheaves of abelian groups on $\mathcal{C}$. Do we have cup-product as follows?
...
- 1,007
4
votes
1
answer
590
views
Do coherent sheaves on rigid analytic spaces form an abelian category?
It is said that the category of sheaves of abelian groups on a Grothendieck site(topology) is an abelian category. On the other hand, it is known that in usual algebraic geometry, given an variety (...
- 2,709
2
votes
2
answers
606
views
In the definition of big/small étale/fppf/... site, is their covering set really a set?
My definition of a site is a pair $(\mathcal{C},\DeclareMathOperator{\Cov}{Cov}\Cov (\mathcal{C}))$ where $\mathcal{C}$ is a category and $\Cov (\mathcal{C})$ is a set consisting of elements of the ...
- 311
7
votes
1
answer
785
views
Applications of $h$-topology and $h$-descent
This is a technical problem about applications of Grothendieck topologies. In some recent works, the technique of $h$-topology and $h$-descent is very useful, for an introduction see https://stacks....
- 6,128
0
votes
0
answers
319
views
Grothendieck topology on a scheme equivalent to the circle
Suppose a class of morphisms of schemes is reasonable enough so that we can associate a small site to any scheme (just like small étale site). Is there a simple class of morphisms such that there is a ...
user138661
6
votes
0
answers
149
views
Does an fppf cohomological class annihilated by an etale cover come from etale cohomological group?
Let $X$ be a scheme, $F$ a sheaf on the fppf site of $X$, and $\alpha\in H^i_{\mathrm{fppf}}(X,F)$ such that it is trivialized by an etale cover of $X$. Does $\alpha$ lie in the image of the canonical ...
- 1,007
4
votes
1
answer
178
views
When can a scheme be recovered from its descent groupoid?
Suppose that $ Y $ is a scheme and $ f\colon X\to Y $ a covering of $ Y $ in some Grothendieck topology on the category of schemes (i.e. if $\{ U_i\to Y\}$ is a covering in the topological sense, then ...
- 295
3
votes
1
answer
313
views
Why are sheaves of a coverage the same as those on its generated Grothendieck coverage?
Preliminaries: There are lots of variations on the settings in which we define sheaves. I am concerned with the details linking the general definition below to the Grothendieck topology it generates; ...
- 352
3
votes
0
answers
281
views
Locality in Grothendieck Topologies
Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a category and $\mathcal{J}$ be a Grothendieck topology on it (i.e., $(\mathcal{C},\mathcal{J})$ is a site). Then what is a good notion of locality in it?
I came up with the ...
- 430