3
$\begingroup$

I've read in many places that every compactly generated group $G$ satisfying Kazdhan's property (T) is not virtually indicable (there is no subgroup $H\leq G$ of finite index which surjects onto $\mathbb{Z}$). However, it is claimed as an obvious fact and I can't find a proof of this fact.

Any help or references will be highly appreciated.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Well, it's not hard but this depends on the definition of Property T. If a compactly generated group has a finite index open subgroup with a continuous nonzero homomorphism to $\mathbf{Z}$, then it actually admits a fixed-point-free continuous isometric action on some Euclidean space. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Nov 30, 2022 at 15:51
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ Also the book "Kazhdan's Property T" by Bekka-Harpe-Valette contains everything to prove this (Property T passes to finite index open subgroups, to quotients, and $\mathbf{Z}$ doesn't have Property T). $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Nov 30, 2022 at 15:52
  • $\begingroup$ @YCor Where is the proof of property $T$ passing to finite index open subgroups? I've seen this to be true in this book just for discrete groups. $\endgroup$
    – Marcos
    Nov 30, 2022 at 15:59
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ No, they do something much more general, see their Theorem 1.7.1: it passes to arbitrary closed subgroups of finite covolume (this includes open subgroups of finite index!). $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Nov 30, 2022 at 16:03
  • $\begingroup$ I think we have established that this does indeed follow easily from the results in Bekka--de la Harpe--Valette. I suggest someone (@YCor?) posts an answer; if not, I'm going to vote to close. $\endgroup$
    – HJRW
    Dec 1, 2022 at 10:19

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.