15
$\begingroup$

The following theorem was proved in [Helmut Wielandt. Eine Verallgemeinerung der invarianten Untergruppen. Mathematische Zeitschrift 45 (1939): 209-244.] a long time ago:

Theorem: (Wielandt) There exists a function $f: \mathbb N \to \mathbb N$, such that for every finite group $G$ and a sub-normal subgroup $H<G$ such that $C_G(H)=\{1\}$, we have $|G| \leq f(|H|).$

Here, $C_G(H)$ denotes the centralizer of $H$ in $G$. Recall, a subgroup $H<G$ is called subnormal if there is a chain of subgroups $$H=G_0 < G_1 < \dots <G_n=G,$$ such that $G_i$ is normal in $G_{i+1}$.

The theorem implies among other things that the automorphism tower $${\rm Aut}^0(G)=G, \quad {\rm Aut}^{n-1}(G) \to {\rm Aut}^n(G):= {\rm Aut}({\rm Aut}^{n-1}(G))$$ of a centerless finite group terminates after finitely many steps, where bounds on number of steps can be obtained from bounds on the mysterious function $f$. Since Wielandt's theorem is more general, it is unclear (to me) if there could be a different method to obtain better bounds on the number of steps needed. However, let us focus on Wielandt's function $f$ for now:

Question: What are the best known lower and upper bounds for Wielandt's function $f$?

One upper bound, which is of the form $$f(n) = \exp(O(n \log(n))),$$ is coming from the following result. It was proved in [Martin Pettet, A note on the automorphism tower theorem for finite groups, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 89 (1983), 182-183], that in the situation above $$|G| \leq |Z(H_{\infty})| \cdot |{\rm Aut}(H_{\infty})|!,$$ where $H_{\infty}$ denotes the nilpotent residual, i.e., the smallest normal subgroup, such that $H/H_{\infty}$ is nilpotent, and $Z(H_{\infty})$ denotes the center of $H_{\infty}$.

A lower bound for $f$ could come from something like $H^n < H^n \rtimes {\rm Sym}(n)$, for some simple group $H$ like ${\rm Alt(5)}$ which yields $$f(60^n) \geq 60^n \cdot n!$$ or in other words $$f(n) = \exp(\Omega(\log(n)\log\log(n)) = n^{\Omega(\log\log(n))}.$$

There is a substantial gap between these lower and upper bounds. Can anyone close the gap?

$\endgroup$

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.