4
$\begingroup$

I am trying to understand the representation theory of the infinite dihedral group, which appears to be calculated in the paper

Berman, S. D.; Buzási, K. Representations of the infinite dihedral group. (Russian) Publ. Math. Debrecen 28 (1981), no. 1-2, 173–187.

The MathSciNet review seems pretty complete, but I am having trouble understanding it. In particular, the review author draws a distinction between non symmetrical polynomials in the group ring $F[x]$ over a field $F$ and symmetrical polynomials, defined as follows

"A polynomial $f(x)\in F[x]$ of degree $m$ is said to be symmetrical if $f(x)=x−1$ or $x^mf(x)=f(x)$[sic]".

This must be a typo! Does anyone know what the correct condition is here?

$\endgroup$
2

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

It is a guess. Possibly what is meant is that the polynomial is palindromic: algebraically this means whenever $\alpha$ is a root $\alpha^{-1}$ is also a root, which translates to $f(x) = x^m f(\frac1x)$.

The exceptional one $f(x)=x-1$ though not palindromic, has a unique root which is 1 which satisfies the algebraic version of the condition about roots. So this is also to be considered part of this family.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ That is a good and probably correct guess, although the root condition you mention is not exactly equivalent to being palindromic since antipalindromic polynomials also satisfy that condition. $\endgroup$
    – Jim Conant
    Aug 23, 2016 at 3:13
  • $\begingroup$ By anti-palindromic perhaps you mean a definition similar to anti-symmetric matrices [coeff of $x^k$ and $x^{m+1-k}$ being of opposite sign] As roots determine a polynomial equation only upto a scalar this should be ok. This also explains the exceptional $x-1$ $\endgroup$ Aug 23, 2016 at 3:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.