4
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a braided monoidal category. We have a canonical functor $\mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C})$ from $\mathcal{C}$ to the Drinfeld center $\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C})$ sending an object $V$ in $\mathcal{C}$ to $(V,c_{V,\,\_})$. Here, $c$ is the braiding in $\mathcal{C}$.

When does this functor admit left/right adjoints, and how do they look like? You are free to assume as much as you want on the category $\mathcal{C}$ (abelian, finite, factorizable, etc).

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Abstractly: C is an E_2-monoidal category, so by the universal property of the Drinfeld center (as the Hochschild cohomology of C, at least if one works in the derived setting), the identity C -> C factors through the canonical functor Z(C) -> C. (The functor Z(C) -> C sends a pair (x, phi) to x.) $\endgroup$
    – skd
    Sep 17, 2020 at 20:19
  • $\begingroup$ @skd Sure, but does this mean that the forgetful functor Z(C) -> C is an adjoint of the above? Sorry, maybe this is trivial.. $\endgroup$ Sep 17, 2020 at 20:28
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ No, the forgetful functor Z(C) --> C is defined even when C is not braided, it has a right adjoint (often called induction) which again doesn't depend on the braiding. For example, it sends 1 to $\bigoplus_x x \otimes x*$ in the semisimple case (and a "canonical coend" in general). It's adjoint can't be the inclusion C --> Z(C) which depends on the braiding for its construction. $\endgroup$ Sep 17, 2020 at 22:49
  • $\begingroup$ @Noah Snyder Thx, that's what I thought. I wasn't sure what skd was trying to tell me $\endgroup$ Sep 18, 2020 at 6:23

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

Short answer: Yes, it can possibly have an adjoint.

Longer answer: Assume that $\mathcal{C}$ is rigid, and that the coend $L = \int^{X \in \mathcal{C}} X^* \otimes X$ exists. It is a coalgebra. Your assumptions on $\mathcal{C}$ were that it is braided, and in that case, it is well-known that $L$ is even a bialgebra. Moreover, we know that ${}_L\mathcal{C} = \mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C})$, i.e. the center of $\mathcal{C}$ is isomorphic to the category of modules over $L$.

Under this isomorphism, your "free central object" $(V, c_{V, -})$ is sent to the trivial $L$-module on $V$, i.e. the action is $\varepsilon \otimes V \colon L \otimes V \to V$, where $\varepsilon \colon L \to 1$ is the counit of $L$. It is an algebra morphism. Thus, walking everything through the isomorphisms, the inclusion functor can actually be interpreted as the pullback functor \begin{align} \varepsilon^* \colon {}_1\mathcal{C} = \mathcal{C} \to {}_L\mathcal{C} \ . \end{align} A sufficient condition for pullbacks along algebra morphisms to have adjoints was identified in my answer to my own question over on M.SE.

Translating to our situtation, $\varepsilon^*$ has a left adjoint if $\mathcal{C}$ has coequalizers and $L$ is coflat (i.e. $L \otimes - $ preserves coequalizers). Then the left adjoint sends an $L$-module $(V, r)$ to the coequalizer of $$ r,\ \varepsilon \otimes id_V \colon L \otimes V \to V \ . $$

So for a particular situation where it works: take $\mathcal{C}$ to be a braided finite tensor category in the sense of EGNO. Then in particular, $\mathcal{C}$ is abelian, so it has coequalizers, and the tensor product is exact, so every object is coflat. Moreover, it's well-known that for these kinds of categories, the coend $L$ indeed does exist.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.