A twist is an automorphism $\theta$ of the identity functor of a monoidal category with braiding $c$, such that $\theta_{X \otimes Y} = c_{Y,X} c_{X,Y} (\theta_X \otimes \theta_Y)$. A braided monoidal category with twist is called balanced monoidal (not to be confused with a different notion of balanced).
It is known that modular categories are ribbon fusion, and thus have a twist. So all Drinfeld centers of fusion categories are balanced monoidal. Furthermore, Drinfeld centers of pivotal categories are pivotal again (see Figure 2 in this article. Pivotal structures and braidings give a balanced structure again. (Although I wouldn't know or care for now if they're ribbon.)
Are Drinfeld centers always balanced monoidal? If not, under which conditions are they balanced monoidal? If yes, how is the twist constructed?
Note that Drinfeld centers of monoidal categories without duals for every object may not have all duals either, and therefore needn't be pivotal. They can nevertheless be balanced monoidal. For example, take the category of all (complex) vector spaces. Infinite dimensional vector spaces don't have dual objects, so this category does not allow a pivotal structure. I'm strongly suspecting that its Drinfeld center is vector spaces again (although I don't know a rigorous proof, since it's not fusion), which has a trivial twist.
Edit: Drinfeld centers of rigid categories are always rigid (i.e. have all duals). Now since in a rigid braided category, twists are equivalent to pivotal structures. So a non-pivotal rigid category might potentially have a non-balanced Drinfeld center (although this is not certain, it might still "accidentally" have a balance if all nonpivotal objects for some reason don't have a half-braiding). I'm quite sure there are non-pivotal rigid categories (by an open conjecture, they'd need to be non-fusion, though) -- although I can't think of any right now -- so here is a place to look for counterexamples.